Yep and I accept your opinion with an open mind Pladio.Or maybe just have a different opinion to yours…
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
Some members just like to antagonize and think their always right.
Yep and I accept your opinion with an open mind Pladio.Or maybe just have a different opinion to yours…
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
Thanks for the short review CRPGNut. I agree with you about the combat as critics compared the game to Witcher III on it's release. How far did you play the game?I think this is one I'll play off and on. I get tired of the tedious combat but then I'll come back in 3 hours and play for another couple. Even though I listed all the dislikes above, the one thing that is wonderful is the graphics. As a walking simulator this game is pure eye candy. In fact, if I could turn off all the robots, I'd probably play longer
Or maybe just have a different opinion to yours.
Of course your opinion is the right one because that's how it works.You're welcome to have any opinion you want of course. You can claim water isn't wet if it suits you. Just don't get offended when people point out when you're obviously wrong.
I find the game limited. You have 3 basic classes, a dozen or less weapon choices (with limited upgrades), a handful of outfits, etc. The game is an obvious console port and it tells. It feels like Witcher 3 with all the limitations to skills, class, gear, protagonist,etc.
A single character that you can play and it's named. I'm not really sure Aloy is female. She acts like a dude and her father figure is an absolute douche that I wish she would have killed. Follow! Heel! Stay! Good boy…um girl…um robot creature. No real romance though a few dudes try to romance her and the one she seems to like is a mommy's boy.
I think I like the lore overall and wish there would have been much more of that in the early going. If this was a game about collecting technology and then using it I'd be more stoked.
Don't hate the game, but I find the console limitations….limiting. The biggest thing that makes no sense is that none of the monsters would pose a challenge to present day troops. There is nothing Aloy can't kill with simple weapons, so how did they wipe out mankind? Is that explained later? One railgun would pretty much win against anything in the game.
I think this is one I'll play off and on. I get tired of the tedious combat but then I'll come back in 3 hours and play for another couple. Even though I listed all the dislikes above, the one thing that is wonderful is the graphics. As a walking simulator this game is pure eye candy. In fact, if I could turn off all the robots, I'd probably play longer
Of course your opinion is the right one because that's how it works.
No, but when it's obvious that you're wrong, and yet you continue to argue anyways, you just start to look foolish after awhile.
There's little doubt HZD is an RPG. We've listed the reasons why, and the only thing you could come up with is that it's an action adventure because it doesn't have as much C&C as you like.
What makes you look even more foolish is that you've never even played the game.
I mean you play a role during the game...but its not an rpg as such.
Its a 3rd person action adventure.
It's on that borderline between RPG and action-adventure like some of the Assassin's Creed series. I would argue that God of War and Ghost of Tsushima are just as much RPGs as HZD is.
Nope is another case of "hey look it have a skill tree so is a RPG case". But it's a really good game can't deny that.
I see it more in the action/adventure open world with little touches of rol play with no to much to consider a pure RPG
Sure, I wouldn't expect you to be the only one this narrow-minded.
In any topic, there's always going to be a minority that wants to argue against common thinking.
Go back to pot meet kettle…
It's not because the devs call it an RPG that it's an RPG.
Correct. It's because it contains more than enough RPG aspects to be called an RPG by most people. Which is probably why it's considered an RPG in general and labeled as such.
I've got a novel idea. Rather than continuing to argue over a game you've never even played and looking foolish for it, why don't you actually try playing it?
Well, since you're the only one thinking it's foolish and narrow-minded to look at reviews, websites and let's plays to judge a game, maybe I shouldn't listen to you.
Here's a novel idea, don't call people names and they might actually listen to what you have to say a bit more. It might make you a better person too.
You don't need to play every game ever made to make an informed opinion about it.
I've already pointed out that I'm certainly not the only one not counting it as an RPG and you dismiss that too. I'm done with you.
I would still argue that HZD is an RPG. But this isn't the really important point for me personally.
This only as an example that "counting" RPG properties of a games has no connection to the games' quality.
Apropos dungeons: I like how in HZD every dungeon is either connected to advancement of the story or to development of the character's abilities. There are no random dungeons unconnected to the overall experience. That supports the feel of a coherent experience of world and story.
Interesting! I don't care for mods since I want to play the game in the way the developers created it. I believe that a game should be a piece of art. I wouldn't buy a painting where have to correct the original colors in order to make it look good. If a game needs mods to become a good game this means that it wasn't a good game to begin with. (Obviously I am not talking about mods which allow you to create new and additional stories, like in NWN - that is great).Final statement: "Allows mods" means a game is infinitely better and that a no mods allowed game cannot conceivably compete with it. If your game is mod-able, you win. Always.
I'm not a console gamer and really hate the non-PC elements in HZD like no save anywhere, lack of weapon and armor choices, very few skills. Those of you who play other genres seem to accept the console rpgs with all these lacks.