Some of the changes I didn't like were e.g. rebranding of weapons (why?) and adding / removing them from certain areas. I guess these changes were in one of the first updates.
I'd like to play the game the way Troika envisioned it. The work of those guys is certainly fantastic, hats off etc, but at the same time they're telling me this: "OK, so you want to have the bugs fixed, right? Sure, but you'll have to deal with the fact that we decided to change a few things. So, some weapons are named differently, just because we wanted; we also put this here, that there..." It's not really a big deal but I think they should keep their own ideas separate from the bugfixes. Come on, if someone found a torn manuscript of the fourth Gormenghast book by Mervyn Peake, would you prefer to read what's left of it after a great deal of reconstructionary work, or would you prefer a version in which the editor decided that erasing some parts and inventing some new ones was the way to go? You should have this choice.
When you look at the recent changelists, they're certainly looking better (bugfix-wise) than the older ones. I stopped being interested after the first few but maybe I'll try the new one.