- Joined
- April 12, 2009
- Messages
- 23,459
But why, oh, whyyyyyyyy?I need to be finished before Nov 30th.
PC review?After watching a two hour review
...
-graphics are poor, art direction is fine
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2009
- Messages
- 23,459
But why, oh, whyyyyyyyy?I need to be finished before Nov 30th.
PC review?After watching a two hour review
...
-graphics are poor, art direction is fine
After watching a two hour review, the main points were:
The product is very well rated.
As usual, this high mark is barely explained by the content of the review.
-graphics are poor, art direction is fine
-poor writing of quests
-companions save one are dull
-it is combat oriented
-UI is poor (K&M work only for the FPS side, the rest is heavy)
-No resolution of quests through competences (science, mechanics etc…)
-Tons of content, tons of quests, denser map
-Survival mode makes combat challenging, that is all (no food, ,no water etc)
-It is not a fall out game
-It is written for US kids
-The world ticks bad, but not as bad as TW3's world
And more
In short, the product is shit, but the reviewer had fun with it, he likes it. Very good score.
Move on.
I get just as much fun from reading Steam reviews where the guy says he hates the game and then it shows a play time of over 100 hours I hate hitting my hand with a hammer. I don't do it for 100 hours before I realize that.
Wat??MGS5? I 100% the game, yet I thumbed it down on Steam.
The Steam review system is meant to support sales.I don't get it either, 2 hours is about my threshold for something I don't like. Sometimes even less, times too precious.
How? The review proceeded over two hours, with the reviewer backing up points with ingame examples. While he gave a very good score to the game, before the hour in the review, people were questioning it as the reviewer kept lining negative point after negative point.You fail…I mean literally.
What's the problem?
I have dozens of hours in Skyrim and I hated it (except Dragonborn).
MGS5? I 100% the game, yet I thumbed it down on Steam.
etc.
Hating something doesn't mean one can't finish it and form an opinion from the whole thing. Besides, some games starts meh but open up in the second half.
Would not know about TW3, I quit TW2 half way and never installed it again.After 5 hours I thought Skyrim was awesome. After 2686 hours I still think its awesome.
After 4 hours of Witcher 3 I thought it was kick-ass. When I got a new PC I didn't reinstall it and never made it past level 8.
Not sure about FO4 yet but closing in on 10 hours and enjoying it a lot.
My bold claim is that different gamers just like different games by having different priorities.
Perhaps you should give TW3 a try. It's quite different from TW2 considering the world design. Some things of course stayed the same though.Would not know about TW3, I quit TW2 half way and never installed it again.
Yeah, it may even be that if two gamers equally like a game, the one complains way more than the other.I am surprised some folks can even find a game they like to play based on their comments at rpgwatch in general.
I quit TW2 because it turned into Twitcher 2. From what I seen it is still Twitcher 3.Perhaps you should give TW3 a try. It's quite different from TW2 considering the world design. Some things of course stayed the same though.
Well said.
People shouldn't mind me, just get bothered by some of the negativity at times. Just seems overboard at times. I am surprised some folks can even find a game they like to play based on their comments at rpgwatch in general.
Based on Steam forums trolls, I tend to believe it's true.Lol. So true, if I didn't know better ( or do I?) I'd think some people don't play games at all.
This. And from those videos they don't have a slightest clue - it's like watching a movie trailer then discussing a movie based on that trailer.They just watch videos
This is partially true.and read the negative reviews