I'd say they usually get away with it easier than, for example, a native swede would..
And I'd say you're basing that on prejudice. Because you don't really have any concrete studies or statistics to back that saying up, do you? Other than newspaper articles (who are notoriously bad at interpreting scientific research).
You think a gang of white christian girls would be freed of something similar? Not very likely.
Freed? Not likely, no. But they might very well have gotten a suspended jail sentence just like the girls in the link got. They also got community service and one of them were handed a curfew, which don't seem like unreasonable/entirely too mild first time sentences, especially when you figure in that they were women (society is silly like that).
It's the same bullshit when immigrants commits rapes they just need to cry out in media a bit. We're already seeing articles about how we should feel sorry for the immigrant rapists, that they can't help it and that they should under no circumstances be deported because of it. It's been a trend for a while now, how the victim is neglected and the perpetrator gets a pat on the back and usually a very mild sentence.
When it comes to rape that's been a trend for ages. And, as I've said earlier, it's in no way limited to immigrants. Rape apologism runs rampant in our culture.
Uberil- do you know what a clitoris is? Cliterectomy and removing foreskin (something which ive had done and enjoy a normal sex life) are two completely different things and done for two entirely different reasons. Im not going to explain, look it up.
One is done for arbitrary cultural reasons, the other for arbitrary cultural reasons. Completely different indeed.
And there's a lot of nerves in the foreskin, so removing it decreases your ability to enjoy sex as well. Not as much as removing the clitoris
It is a tradition in Jewish culture, NOT Christian!! Please don't display your ignorance in public; it's embarrassing.
Christians in the US do it a lot. So if female circumcition is a Muslim tradition male circumsition is a Christian tradition. But, like you said:
No, his comment is clear and wrong. While some Christian men may be circumcised (often at birth in certain hospitals) it is NOT and NEVER has been a part of Christian belief, doctrine, or tradition!!
Which is exactly my point: female circumsition isn't a Muslim tradition at all. It's a cultural tradition that happens to be practised by some Muslims, just like male circumsition is a cultural tradition that happens to be practised by some Christians.
You cannot even fathom the facts when theyre put right in front of you. Yes, 34% of the rapes that police (the ones who are in charge with dealing with this sort of thing) concluded were rapes. Youre so blind to the fact that your little multi-culti utopian worldview of the innocent immigrant could be anything but wrong. It cant be true, why the lads just get away with it more!
Why must you excuse them? Why are you looking for an "explanation" of the facts? Could the explanation simply be that its the truth? What a mind-blower!
Wise men form opinions slowly.
(The same goes for women in case anyone wonders - they're no different in this respect.)
When it comes to statistics there are two very popular sayings. The less popular of the two is that statistics don't lie. That is true (unless they're forged, of course). The more popular is that there are three kinds of lies: lies, damn lies and statistics. That is sometimes true. Or, rather, sometimes statistics is presented in a manner that make it seem like the correct conclusion isn't the correct conclusion at all.
The most important thing in understanding statistics isn't the numbers, it's understanding what the numbers actually say.
Now, in this case we have a number. In 34 % of the rape investigations that leads to charges being pressed the perpetrator is an immigrant. The important question is 'why?' - why is it that it's so common that pepole charged and convicted for rape are immigrants? Well, the obvious explanation is that they rape more. However, there are other possible explanations as well. One is the racism explanation I highlighted earlier. A third is that immigrants, due to not being as familiar with the subtle parts of western culture don't know how to give the appearance of not having raped anyone - when westerners rape someone they know what to say and how to act to make it seem like they either didn't do it or simply made a mistake.
That's three explanations and they all explain the data. Why then are you so quick to conclude that the first is the correct one? And why are you mocking me for awknowledging that the situation might be more complicated than it seem at first glance?
Übereil